| Subject: | Re: Oregon Teams by membership |
| Date: | 12/24/2005 06:23 AM |
| From: | Gary Malcolm |
|
Rich does have a bit of a point. A team like Fred Meyer would really stand out with his method. A more balanced approach might be to take the top 3 team members from each Category on BAR points and then add those all up. This would allow smaller teams their day in the sun as well as promote competition at all levels. On the other hand... I just think it's pretty darn cool that we have these kick ass teams! Gary Malcolm On 12/23/05, david baker <dirt-@clearwire.net> wrote: Yeah, and then we could have diffrerent team classifications for averages of age and ability, oh and discipline. Candy, got some time to kill? But really I think you would see a lot of smaller teams, and that would not help anything. Barry Wicks could start his own one man team and have the highest average. People would start teams that only had members that scored well, kind of killing the team spirit theory, were not pro right? ----- Original Message ----- *From:* Cowan-@aol.com *To:* cmur-@obra.org ; ob-@topica.com *Sent:* Friday, December 23, 2005 2:35 PM *Subject:* Re: [OBRA Chat] Oregon Teams by membership Since you have team points and team members per team, a more meaningful team comparison than the team BAR would be average points per team member (Total Team Points / Members per Team), then rank the teams. This would put all teams on equal footing and level the playing field. Rich To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com. To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com. To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org To unsubscribe send to obra-uns-@topica.com -- Gary Malcolm /\ / \/\ ........ __o /\/ \ ---... .. \<, _/ \_______(_)/(_) |
