| Subject: | Re: Oregon Teams by membership |
| Date: | 12/23/2005 06:23 AM |
| From: | david baker |
|
Yeah, and then we could have diffrerent team classifications for averages of age and ability, oh and discipline. Candy, got some time to kill? But really I think you would see a lot of smaller teams, and that would not help anything. Barry Wicks could start his own one man team and have the highest average. People would start teams that only had members that scored well, kind of killing the team spirit theory, were not pro right? ----- Original Message ----- From: Cowan-@aol.com To: cmur-@obra.org ; ob-@topica.com Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 2:35 PM Subject: Re: [OBRA Chat] Oregon Teams by membership Since you have team points and team members per team, a more meaningful team comparison than the team BAR would be average points per team member (Total Team Points / Members per Team), then rank the teams. This would put all teams on equal footing and level the playing field. Rich To respond to the whole group send to ob-@topica.com. To respond to the list manager send to cmur-@obra.org |
